metafandom
[personal profile] phoebe_zeitgeist

  • [personal profile] kaigou: three things! just three!: In general, I don't have a problem with a fanfic writer who poaches his/her own work for use in an ofic. You'll see the advice all over the place: you can get away with basing an original work on a derived work, as long as you file off the serial numbers.

    All good and well, but how does one know just how much filing is enough?

  • [personal profile] rahirah: On Writing Children: "So you want to write babyfic, but don't want to get tarred with the dread brush of 'Eeeeew, babyfic!'"

    Well, the bad news is, you can't avoid the dread brush no matter how hard you try. The good news is, you can take steps to ensure that if some babyfic hater clicks on your story link by accident, they won't immediately click away. If you play your cards right, you may even get the coveted "I usually hate babyfic, but..." feedback. So let us say that you've given in to the compulsion to make your favorite characters breed. What next?
    (tags: writing btvs ats)

  • [personal profile] princessofgeeks: "social networking doesn't scale": Clive Thompson writes: "...Technically speaking, online social-networking tools ought to be great at fostering these sorts of clusters. ... But when the conversation gets big enough, it shuts down. Not only do audiences feel estranged, the participants also start self-censoring."

    ...what's the magic number where social network lapses back into old-fashioned broadcasting or column-writing, in your experience?

kitty and lockheed
[personal profile] lovelokest

  • [personal profile] elf: : Closed canon vs open canon - We need a third category: sprawl canon. I've been dabbling in DC comics fandom, mostly the Bat-family, and it is a veritable Shub-Niggurath of canon, with tentacles wrapped around bits of fandoms (which are parts of itself) and strange orifices opening and closing endlessly. -
    (tags: canon)

  • rhoboat: Thoughts on vidding stuff - Where I'm going with all this is that there have been occasions where I've definitely noticed some technical issues from vidders who've been doing this a long time, often a lot longer than I. I think it's easier to forgive newbies, especially when I see improvement over time. But sometimes I feel like I'm dancing around eggshells (mixed metaphor, ha!), because I have no idea how to approach certain people or if I even should approach them. -
metafandom
[personal profile] inalasahl

  • mjules: One Reason Why Western [American?] Culture Makes These Conversations So Difficult - Sure, we can all agree that certain people who consistently exhibit -ist behavior are probably, at least on some level, bigoted, especially when the behavior is explicit and unambiguous. However, most -ist behavior isn't -ist because of the way a person thinks or feels; it is problematic because of the way it interacts with larger systems. -
    (tags: discussions)

  • undomielregina: A Theory About Character Bashing - Generally, I think that whether a female character is used to make fans feel bad about the character's actions is at least as important as whether she's presented as a love interest when it comes to the quantity and severity of the character bashing directed at her in slash. -

  • phoebe_zeitgeist: On derailing and complexity. Or one tiny corner thereof. - So [personal profile] wistfuljane and I have been demonstrating the phenomenon of two people separated by a common language in her journal for the past twelve hours or so; and I feel more than ordinarily like a space alien. I used words and all, but I'm fairly sure from Jane's reactions that I might as well have been speaking in the language of snakes for all the sense I made to her. Which would not be surprising, because I have only the dimmest notion even now of what she's been trying to tell me. -
Dreadful the cat
[personal profile] fairestcat

  • [personal profile] gnatkip: Glee art - Inspired by the many thoughtful posts I've seen discussing Glee's portrayal of race, gender, ability, sexuality, and abuse -- and also inspired by Strange Maps, GraphJam, and sensory/motor homunculi -- I had an idea to diagram the representation of Glee's characters. -

  • [livejournal.com profile] were_lemur: Fuck It. Deal Me In. - For every character female character who is killed off, turned evil, or just plain not mentioned to make way for the mansex, there's one who is warped out of character so that she's incomplete without a man or gives up her badassitude for babies for no other reason that she's found her one true (male) love. Just because het centers on women doesn't make it automatically feminist, and there is slash with strong female characters in supporting roles. -

  • [personal profile] wistfuljane: Act of Derailing - Here's the thing, derailing* is not whether someone has a relevant/interesting/excellent point to contribute to a conversation or being "on-topic." It's not about intention or space. It's about shifting the discussion away from a central focus, but more importantly, it's about deflecting the focus of attention away from the affected part(ies). -

  • [personal profile] quinfirefrorefiddle: Talking to annoying people (and maybe just a little bit about them) - I've mentioned before that I worry about internet wank because it doesn't seem to allow for forgiveness. But I also worry about internet wank because it doesn't allow for time to grow. -
Dreadful the cat
[personal profile] fairestcat

  • [personal profile] poisontaster: I Have Questions! You Have Answers? - Do you always blame the typos on bad editing? [POLL] -

  • [personal profile] elf: So-called self-identified bi women - We don't have clear simple labels for "male who only wants intercourse with females, but gets hot as hell seeing guys in corsets and is happy to kiss them and do a bit of fondling." Don't have labels for "girls who like to kiss girls and cuddle with them and have never had spark & opportunity to find out if they'd like more/other than that." -

  • [personal profile] sailorptah: I've genderswapped a canon!male just to draw her in a man's suit. Where does that fit in? - I mean, as far as I'm concerned, swapping a character's sex or gender in either direction is awesome, and is all part of the bigger constellation of Sex/Gender/Gender Expression Are Not Fixed, Let Us Celebrate That. And while I can see people objecting to sticky patterns of bias, the one that seems to be universally complained about has absolutely nothing to do with my experience. -

  • [livejournal.com profile] merricatk: Why linkspam is an unsafe place for writers. - The comment told me that my post had been included in linkspam. Cool, I thought, and went over to take a look. // What I found was that [Warning: derailing] had been affixed to the front of my the excerpt to my post. Somehow, by minding my own business, writing in my own LJ, I was derailing the debate they were archiving. -
    (tags: fandom modding)

  • [livejournal.com profile] garrideb: Not Shipping Shawn/Juliet Doesn't Make Me A Bad Feminist. - There are standard reasons for not liking canon het pairings, and these reasons are getting labeled as excuses for simply not wanting to write mm/mf due to internalized misogyny and feeling that the woman is 'not good enough' for the leading man. I'm sure this is true for some fen, but it is not my experience and I hate to see valid reasons being dismissed. -

  • [livejournal.com profile] ithiliana: The stories we tell about...the stories we tell - The early postings in any current manifestation of the imbroglio (more about this later) often start out with fairly clearly drawn lines (which could be called "us vs. them" in many cases), but the more people read, think, and post, the more those lines are blurred, scuffed, messed up, and debated. In the process, there are individuals who can be foolish (as noted in the Fanlore entry!), individuals who fail in various ways, and also individuals who break my heart with their breathtakingly beautiful stories and ideas. -

  • [livejournal.com profile] cidercupcakes: There's nothing better on a snowy Saturday night than curling up with a hot cup of tl;dr. - Here is what confuses me, though -- is "my flist might not be interested" really that huge a stumbling block for, you know, talking about fandom? I mean, I can understand it if, say, your flist is mostly people from your offline life, who might be bemused at best by your desire to talk about how Character X and Character Y from Movie Z are TOTALLY IN LOVE, but when your flist is largely people from fandom...is my flist just inordinately cool, that if I'm yammering about something they don't give a shit about, they'll just scroll past, or just get excited because I'm excited? -
    (tags: fandom)
kitty and lockheed
[personal profile] lovelokest

  • [personal profile] copracat: The female characters are written by the - The female characters are written by the same people who write the male characters. Do the writers' limitations and prejudices cease to exist they write male characters? Or do they just not matter? -

  • austrianschool: Appro Aggro and the Economics of Fandom Exchange - The Americanisation of this debate, if one can call it a debate, which I beg leave to doubt, is that Americans are peculiarly incapable, for perfectly understandable reasons of their peculiar history, of not casting such debates in the mould of Discussions About Race.[5] Gay rights, women's rights, it matters not: they must cut them to the pattern of the long and honourable struggle for civil rights in the face of racial segregation and racialism. Race, in the American sense of that remarkably 'loaded' and surprisingly slippery term -
metafandom
[personal profile] inalasahl

  • legionseagle: Juliet (The Dice Were Loaded From The Start) - People put forward the argument that this problem of dire baggage is also true when writing male characters like Draco, say. I would, however, argue that there's a difference. If one sets out to write Draco as a half-way sympathetic character one has to get round various aspects of the little brat's canonical characterisation, certainly. But those aspects are not things JK Rowling put there because she thought they were what women readers were looking for, or which were intended to make Draco sympathetic in the first place, whereas Gwen's being "the heart of the team" is. You're told by TPTB that you're supposed to like her and identify with her and the natural response is, "Who, me? Why?" -

  • alixtii: Femslash and the Lesbian Experience. Which Is Clearly Not My Experience. - my impression has always been that in more or less exactly the way that m/m slash isn't actually about real-world gay men (in a way that some interlocutors have found problematic, to say the least), femslash isn't about lesbians. -
metafandom
[personal profile] phoebe_zeitgeist

  • bodlon: More thoughts about hot man-on-man action - Fandom and the slash community are not a "women's space." That's ridiculous. It may be a space where the population skews heavily female, and where the men involved sometimes struggle to be acknowledged (pet peeve: things which should be inclusive that start with the word "fangirls"), but fandom isn't the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival. I can't speak for all the men I know who write slash, but I've certainly never been made to feel unwelcome or like a guest instead of a full participant when I do get involved. -

  • [personal profile] melusina: I know this much is true - There's a great deal of value in examining fanfic and fandom culture for conscious and unconscious stereotyping, oppression and erasure, but I don't think there's any value in sweeping generalizations that don't recognize the diversity of fandom and fannish experiences (or for that matter, the diversity of real life experiences!). -

  • [personal profile] fairestcat: *rages* - I'm open and sometimes confrontationally out in both my online and offline life, but in terms of active interaction, slash fandom is my primary lgbt community. And that community is no less real or important than the mainstream queer community, or femslash fandom, or any of the dozens of other ways we have for finding and connecting with each other. This is my lgbt community, and I reject your claims that it is "anti-gay" simply because it doesn't look or sound like yours. -
rodney - sarcasm
[personal profile] amireal

  • The Acrimonious One - Part 1 There aren't enough interesting women to write about - These female characters are often presented in a way that women are expected to identify with, and they are often limited to the role of support of the male lead and they often embody sexist stereotypes. Some examples, so I'm not just generalizing: Rinoa (Final Fantasy 8); Elizabeth (Pirates of the Caribbean); Aeris (Final Fantasy 7); Kate (Lost). All of these characters have some good characteristics, but many women legitimately feel resentful and uncomfortable with the expectations of women that the characters perpetuate. That this resentment is expressed with misogyny against the characters as women is a troubling product of our misogynist culture, but I don't think the solution is to expect all women to embrace these characters as totally awesome. -

  • phoebe_zeitgeist: Inquiring minds want to know. - My reaction to the current round of discussion about writers' responsibilities to those who are or might be harmed by unexamined privilege expressed in the writers' work has been, roughly: -

  • [personal profile] calicokat: I've been trying to figure out if I have - I'm not trying to brag. Rather, I'm saying you can love female characters, write female characters, follow female characters and be passionate about female characters and still write, read, enjoy and adore slash. These things are not mutually exclusive. -

  • [profile] meri_sefket: One Fan's Experience - I thought I'd start share my own history in fandom because maybe my own story can show the myriad ways in which I failed, recognized that fail, moved on, and expanded my fannish experience. -

  • [profile] freifraufischer: Femslash and the Lesbian Experience. Or rather my lesbian experience. - The long and the short of it is that in my almost twenty years in fandom I have run across very few slash stories that were written by gay men, or had any relation to LGBT culture as I have experianced it for the last fifteen years. While I am willing to concede that the queer community is not one subculture, but several, there complete absence of any elements of gay male culture that I am familiar with leads me to believe that slash is almost excursively the domain of straight female authors. -

  • tielan: on snowflakes and snowdrifts - You can make choices for perfectly good, utterly rational, and totally unique reasons, and still be part of a bigger problem. -
Dreadful the cat
[personal profile] fairestcat
pic#291865
[personal profile] oula

  • melannen: Hi! I am still lacking energy to do anything - If, like me, you recently got weird malware on your system that tried to get you to install anti-virus software, and couldn't figure out where from because you'd only been on trustworthy sites, you probably got it from an ad running on Livejournal. -
    (tags: lj malware psa)

  • [personal profile] 51stcenturyfox: Huh. - Uh... you do... realise that in fanfiction you can write female characters better and write them into healthy, hot, sex-positive relationships even if those don't exist in the source material, right? This is not really more farfetched than a story about two canonically straight guys falling in love with each other and running through a field of daisies and fucking all over desks and spaceships and getting m-pregnant? -

  • [personal profile] china_shop: it's not a miracle, but it feels like one - Some differences I've noticed between my writing and vidding processes -

  • [profile] lyssie: The more things change.... ALL OF THIS HAS HAPPENED BEFORE. - Step 7. Explain to your friends list how you like this one movie/show and the woman (possibly plural) in it because it subverts gender types and tropes, and how AWESOME it is, but how sad you are that you can never talk about it (or women) because everyone you know is a boyslasher. And you wouldn't want to dare harsh their squee by talking about vaginas. -
    (tags: gender fandom)

  • [profile] le_mru: metafandom - Lubię het, ale kiedy jest to het - z braku słów - subwersywny, nie heteronormatywne pici polo, które nas otacza i które spływa z ekranów kin i telewizorów. Bo chyba też po to jest fandom, żeby tworzyć alternatywę, coś nowego, coś innego. -

  • hl: about: warnings - A warning is not a judgement on the people who made the content. It can also be accompanied with a private or public judgement (to say anything else would be disingenuous), but a warning in itself has nothing to do with the author of that content. It's a call made by the one putting up the warning (i.e. it's a call made by a person or a group, and thus, invariably subjective and flawed) done for the benefit of the people who don't, yet, know the content. -
    (tags: warnings)

  • [profile] mistresscurvy: On Privilege and Responsibility - There is a huge difference between saying that there are instances of problematic characterizations or plot points or objectification that should be addressed and saying that women aren't allowed to write about gay men's experiences fullstop. The fact that there are examples of fail within a genre doesn't mean that the entirety of the genre is rotten. -
wide open road
[personal profile] acari

  • [personal profile] such_heights: help, help, I'm being erased! - In the great sprawling land that is the internet, it makes no sense to say "there should be more x!" and mean "there should be less y!". -

  • [livejournal.com profile] vamp_ress: A Man's World - Or, my absolute pet peeve in slash fiction: writing a cast of about ten to fifteen male characters and making them all gay. I'm sorry, I'm a big slash fan, but even I need at least a little reality in the stuff I read to find enjoyment in it. I find these types of stories the most problematic in terms of what miera_c is describing, because they seem to totally erase the female perspective from a story pretending the world truly only consists of gay men. -

  • [personal profile] autumnus: About female characters and fandom - Check how many people are even bothering to talk about the topic, the key part of it: the erasure of women in fan work. The het/slash is presented as a consequence/instance of a deeper problem, not as the problem itself. However if slash was not mentioned, would this have even made metafandom? -

  • [personal profile] jesse_the_k: [in access_fandom] Making Space for Wheelchairs and Scooters - There are many elements to making your event wheelchair-accessible. -

  • [personal profile] lightgetsin: So it turns out there are people with disabilities in fandom - You guys, seriously. There are disabled people in fandom. In fandom in particular because internet socializing may be the only kind many people have access to. We are on your friends lists, and we read your comments, and yeah, I'm sure I'm not the only one who can tell when you assume that every person reading you is able-bodied, because that's just what people are, right? -

  • [livejournal.com profile] elizah_jane: Everybody's Free (To Be Fannish) - I had occasion recently to link someone to the sunscreen thing and it got me thinking. I'm sure that there are approximately half a billion of these for fandom, but whatever. Here's mine! -

  • [livejournal.com profile] carolyn_claire: Okay, now I'm getting annoyed. - Pointing out "negative trends" and then calling any refutation of those supposed trends by the participants "excuses" and refusing to listen isn't a productive way to add value to any discussion and reveals your biases. -

  • [livejournal.com profile] musesfool: it's all how you use it - It never fails to amaze me that we place female characters in such an awful catch-22. They can't be perfect, but they can't be flawed! They can't be seen as vulnerable, but they can't be too strong! If they're assertive and confident and good at what they do, they're Mary Sues at least and arrogant bitches at worst, but if they're soft-spoken and meek, they're either doormats or have some secret scheming agenda and only APPEAR to be sweet. -
    (tags: gender fandom)
kitty and lockheed
[personal profile] lovelokest

  • gabrielleabelle: My Fandom is All Genres - It doesn't have to be slash to be subversive or transgressive. Het writers are subverting up the wazoo. -

  • [personal profile] miera_c: The list of excuses for debunking - OK I want to compile a list of the excuses we hear so often when the subject of female characters & their presence comes up. I figure, if the list of the most commonly used ones is out there with each excuse debunked, it will help them lose their power. -
    (tags: gender fandom)

  • [personal profile] elf: Ethics of commenting - Is it proper to comment (squeefully) on the fic of people you know don't like you? How about people who you suspect don't like you and might rather just forget you exist? -

  • [personal profile] havocthecat: Misogyny is wrong. Who knew? - Just. For crying out loud, people. I'm a woman. Misogyny and people who exhibit inadvertent male privilege is a pretty unavoidable part of my life experience. Is it such a shocker that I might get fed up with it in my hobby and want to talk about how much it sucks? -

  • [personal profile] sixish: [in asexual_fandom] Possibly Ace Characters - What characters have you always wanted to see written as asexual, regardless of how canon portrays them? -

  • [personal profile] copracat: an exercise - And I thought to myself how does that work? Can I bring myself to see the fail in something I love, that I would defend with unreasonable passion, that it would hurt me to admit failed? SGA doesn't count, you see, because it was already hurting me. I wasn't risking anything to criticise it. -

  • [personal profile] cimorene: on feminism & queerness, women and slash, m/m vs female characters - The net result is that if I prefer queerable major characters with other major characters of the same gender in basically mainstream media fandoms, I am mostly engaged by m/m slash. If I prefer female-centric genre stories, I have very few options in current tv and movies, even if I'm willing to go for ones which don't have very active fandoms. If I prefer female-centric media and queerable stories about major characters (which I do), I'm mostly shit out of luck. I can have one at a time, but not both, without wading into the much less easy and engaging waters of small fandoms, inactive fandoms, long-dead fandoms. -

  • jane_elliot: [in epic_rants] My issues with het... - There are a lot of folks out there who refuse to read het. I am not one of them. However, based on the last few het stories I've read (or tried to read) over the last day or to, I'm starting to see why 'het' is gradually becoming a dirty word. -
    (tags: het sexism)

  • paradox_dragon: Queer women, the slash debate, and the question of internalized oppression - So the dynamics of privilege do not make it impossible that queer women can harm queer men through our storytelling. Or that any activity in which queer women participate gets an automatic homophobia-free stamp of approval. Internalized homophobia is so insidious because it is often used by the privileged group to justify its oppressive behavior -

  • mothwing: You can't write in a vacuum - Most writers seem to be writing primarily for entertainment, to explore themselves, and most readers seem to read only for entertainment and escapism purposes, too. This is fine. I do that. I just don't agree with escaping at the cost of other people -

  • [personal profile] laughingrat: Too tired for meta? Surely you jest. - it sort of parallels some shit I said about slash back in the day (back in the day three months ago) about how women* may just be using slash** as a way of exploring sexual relationships*** between partners with equal social status, or at least between partners who have to deal with incredibly little demeaning sexist bullshit, which leaves the writer and reader free to explore, you know, actual love, or power dynamics, or class, or race, or Hawt Smexins, without having the all-pervasive smelly dead-skunk spectre of Patriarchy all up in the mix -
metafandom
[personal profile] inalasahl
pic#291865
[personal profile] oula
Dreadful the cat
[personal profile] fairestcat
pic#291865
[personal profile] oula
kitty and lockheed
[personal profile] lovelokest

  • [personal profile] naraht: History without oppression? - But zvi's critique does also leave me with serious philosophical questions about the extent to which it's even possible to write a happy, oppression-free historical AU. To start with I don't believe you can justify it by means of alternate history. If you attempted to alter history that much you'd end up with something that looked completely unlike Regency England, and I don't think that's the goal. -

  • [personal profile] zvi: You don't have to go looking for this stuff, it just traipses across your reading page, you guys - A different way to write historical fanfic is to write it up like a live action costuming event, where people wear the right clothes and stand in the right cities, and make some vague noises about being a lord or a slave or whatever, but speak in a turn of the millenium dialect and evince turn of the millenium attitudes, and are really completely inaccurate, except for historical allusions one uses to serve as window dressing or needs to drive the plot. And the problem with writing such a story up the second way is that one's twenty first century attitudes gloss right over historical realities without necessarily examining the set up for internal consistency and plot-unrelated offensiveness. -

  • rivkat: Climbing the walls - Let me unpack that a little. As to Kripke (here, "Kripke" will stand for "the forces that get SPN to TV in the form it has"): No, I don't think he has an obligation not to speak about/back to fandom. It's not Fight Club and it's not his Fight Club anyway. Yes, I do think he executed his portrayal of fangirls very badly, in line with SPN's general problems with women, sexuality, and women's sexuality. And we can totally call him on it! I've seen lots of fans debate issues of power, appropriation, othering, and so on in our own works; just because SPN's creative forces are unlikely to listen to criticism in this vein is no reason to exempt SPN. -

  • handyhunter: i just like this icon. hundred is scruffy and pouty! - No story is perfect, but I wonder if they can be imperfect in ways that does not result from not having chromatic main characters (and cultures). If movies are going to fudge around with comics canon (which is confusing and sometimes non-sensical anyway), why not change the race of the main character (instead of the villain or victim)? -

  • [personal profile] telesilla: Write ONLY what you know and an unpopular fannish opinion. - This latest round of gay men having fits about women daring to write about gay sex? Feels a lot more like "hey! Keep out of our fort! Didn't you see the big NO GIRLS ALLOWED!!!! " than anything else. -

  • [personal profile] melannen: Science, y'all.So, over 9 polls, in a variety of slash subfandoms from the late-teens yaoi set to the mid-thirties meta fans set, dates ranging over 7 years. Only one poll had less than 50% queer participants, and that was the earliest one, and even it was at 37%. The median percent of queer participants was 59.7%, and the mean was 61.5%.

    SO when people say things like "slash fans are appropriating queer experience", what THE MAJORITY OF SLASHERS, WHO IDENTIFY AS QUEER hear is either "you aren't queer enough, your queer identity isn't real" or "male voices are the only ones qualified to speak for the queer community."