Metafandom

March 23rd, 2005

08:45 pm

[identity profile] cathexys.livejournal.com: 23rd of March, 2005

Fandom Meta

[livejournal.com profile] glossing - meta: visuality, genre, fanfic, and on and on... The text-only conditions of mailing lists predominate in our fic. . . . What kind of stories could we tell if we really *used* the capabilities of the web? . . . I don't expect forking hypertexts and multiple-media sagas to replace the 14K 'ship vignette -- nor would I, honestly, really enjoy that at all. I do think, however, that there's lots of room to explore, and it'd be cool if we did that

[livejournal.com profile] cordelia_v - Drive-By Random Kindness: Fandom and Altruism But it's a marvelous supplement to RL, I've discovered. Online fandom exposes you to the lives of people from outside your little demographic/regional niche, and gives you new chances for small acts of random kindness.

[livejournal.com profile] fuschia - la grande horizontale So, the question is: can kinks or genres be considered fandoms?

[livejournal.com profile] thetreacletart - When feedback goes bad. I’ve been wondering when constructive criticism crosses the line

[livejournal.com profile] dragonscholar in [livejournal.com profile] fanthropology - RPS: The Issue Fanthropology takes up the latest round on RPS: So, where do you folks stand - is RPS/RPF wrong/right, or not even an issue? Does it deserve all the attention it's gotten, does it deserve more - or less? What reactions are you seeing. What for that matter *IS* RPS/RPF in a world of fictionalized history and character/actor line blurring like wrestling? What about the legal implications?

[livejournal.com profile] hederahelix in [livejournal.com profile] fanthropology - RPS: Another Perspective no one else from the RPS world has stepped in to say anything (or they hadn’t when I started writing this), so I’m going to go ahead and rehash the basics *again*.

[livejournal.com profile] idlerat - informed consent, IRBs, and RPF the RPS "debate" is a little like the IRB debate . . . In each case, there's a debate about whether you need to obtain consent before writing about people

[livejournal.com profile] qe2 - randomness more on RPS: it's my considered opinion that a great deal of the power behind that desire arises from those same folks' equally strong desire to read that scarynasty stuff themselves, and their bone-deep fear of what that says about them.

[livejournal.com profile] penknife - What do we mean by "squick," anyway? I've seen people saying that "squick" means "icky, disgusting, horrible, like [an improbable sex act that I would rather not describe]." And this throws me a little, because it seems to me that when I first got into fandom, the whole point of using "squick" was that it was value-neutral.

[livejournal.com profile] sisabet - Me, Myself And Our Explanation To the World on fannishness, fandom, and creativity: To find out that there are other people like me - that do this exact same thing - well it is very exciting

[livejournal.com profile] ingrid_m - With only a teeny bit of sarcasm ... How is that someone who is so comfortable in the status of their pairing choice gets so antsy and, dare I say it, angry, as if suffering a crisis of confidence, when other pairings starring one half of an OTP are discussed/written about?


Specific Fandom Meta

[livejournal.com profile] themostepotente - Fandom Discussion: The Time Turner and Quantum Physics and a Post-Apocalyptic Hogwarts? there has to be some correlation between magic and quantum physics

[livejournal.com profile] marinarusalka - Meta: Individual morality in the Potterverse on winning and being morally right

[livejournal.com profile] sisabet - Buffy Fan... No Mention of Apologies Anywhere In this Post on Buffy and those who criticize it I realize now that I don't think I will ever be able to have a rational conversation with someone that does not like Buffy, possibly because my love for her is not rational. . . . So I give up. Not on Buffy. On being rational.


On Reading and Writing

[livejournal.com profile] sistermagpie - Know your characters--but not someone else's! I've been reading several different threads that got me thinking about how wow, as fans we really seem to walk this odd line between wanting to be able to be creative and interact with the a canon on our own, and also needing that canon to be. . ."clear and authoritative."

[livejournal.com profile] musesfool - if I were a sculptor, but then again, no... (on remixing) response to [livejournal.com profile] kattahj - It looks like a ficathon; it feels like a competition... and [livejournal.com profile] emrinalexander - I'm Confused, As Is Usual

[livejournal.com profile] fictualities - Up to no good? Challenges The whole concept of fic challenges raises an interesting question for me, though: where the hell do people get their ideas, and do the more social kinds of interactions in fandom -- challenges, prompts, RPGs, remixes, ficathons, etc. -- help or hurt this creativity?


Links, Humor, Debate

[livejournal.com profile] executrix - Or a Very Good Lady about the TV semiotics of "bitch," as increasingly used of male characters

[livejournal.com profile] flambeau - the fannish review lacan, deconstruct, reconstruct, ibuprofen.

[livejournal.com profile] cereta - Hot Spots what are your...not so much hot buttons as accuracy sticking points?